Christian view radiometric dating executive dating in israel

Therefore, all the C-14 remaining in the organism will eventually decay and disappear.

If one can measure the rate in which it decays, and the amount the organism started off with, then one might be able to figure out when the organism, such as a frog, croaked.

But, as C-14 continuously decays, it is also continuously being replaced by new C-14 being formed.

After about 8 half-lives, the remaining amount of C-14 (if there is any remaining) is too small to be measured.

For this reason, it is simply impossible for carbon dating to give dates as old as millions of years. Closed systems, void of any contamination and without loss of the parent element (C-14) or daughter element. Known amounts of parent and daughter elements present from the beginning. If the decay rate of C-14 were not always constant, then this would be devastating to the technique's credibility.

Introduction Many people have been led to believe that carbon dating (along with other radioactive dating methods) proves the earth to be much older than 6,000 years old.

If the dates received from carbon dating are accurate, it would be a huge problem for those who believe in the Genesis account of creation.

For this reason, I will have to bite the bullet and accept that it is reasonable to assume the decay rate is constant (even though I give this assumption, this doesn’t mean the decay rate is constant.

Rather I am conceding due to no current evidence for the contrary).

A correct date is not possible unless there was neither the addition nor loss of parent or daughter isotopes.” This assumption is not one that I am willing to concede on.

In order for carbon dating to work (and this applies to other dating methods as well), the parent and daughter concentrations must have not been altered throughout the specimen’s history.

The displaced neutrons bond with nitrogen-14 (N-14) converting it into C-14.

Tags: , ,