Validating a web page canadian single dating

Even though these features are supported, you should still use new, non-standard, functionality. And means that your site won't be 100% valid, which, at the end of the day, shouldn't get your feathers in a ruffle.The parsers also don't take into account graceful degradation. Our framework is tested in almost every perceivable browser, and battle-tested daily by our 20-plus team of engineers and designers, and yet we still don't meet validation, even though it renders well in most every browser.

So by the time a developer realizes they need to validate their code, it is riddled with issues, making it much more difficult to debug.

A web validator shouldn't be used as a debugging tool. The built-in developer tools in the browsers have gotten extremely sophisticated and will now notify you if there are any parse errors while processing your HTML, CSS or Java Script.

Validation is also frequently done against live code, which opens up other problems.

Live code is typically compressed, which causes issues with the validator's parser.

Validation helped spur interest in standards among developers.

It helped get your website working in browsers that were less powerful and less forgiving, where a small typo could cause the browser to crash.

While the use of such tools has benefits (in the sense of being an automated fresh pair of eyes), a worrying trend of either over or under-dependence keeps rearing its ugly head.

This article aims to underpin the inherent issues of validating your websites through automated web services/tools and how using these tools to meet certain requirements can miss the point entirely.

The W3C was formed in 1994 to develop and maintain open standards to counteract what the original creators of the Web saw as a cruel and indecent assault on everything they'd created.

Tags: , ,